Tuesday, May 11, 2010

SB 1070 Arizona Immigration

I served an LDS mission in Mexico and LOVE the Mexican people. I love the fact that they have brought their culture to the United States. I have come to also love the other latin cultures through several friendships. If they are willing to pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United states and pay taxes, I'd rather have them as neighbors than some of the closed-door caucasians I know.

With that said, I think its important for people outside Arizona to know why this bill was passed. I grew up in Arizona until I was 19 and know what is going on there now. The drug cartel isn't just taking over Northern Mexico. Its taking over Southern Arizona as well. The media is attacking the new law because of the potential for racial profiling. Since when does being required to show proof of citizenship (drivers license) lead to racial profiling?

Despite what the ACLU, CNN, the New York Times, TNT and President Obama are saying, the majority of Arizonans are in favor of the law. Also of little note in the media is the fact that the majority of polled U.S. Citizens are in favor of the law. Many other states are now also considering enacting a similar law. WHY?!

Where were the Feds when Rancher Rob Krentz was murdered by the drug cartel on his ranch a month ago? The Federal government also failed to protect a young family in my inlaws' church group. They were boxed in by 3 cars and shot with their 1 year old sitting in the back seat. The man of the couple was a member of the U.S. Consolate in Mexico. The drug cartel is getting bolder and stronger. President Obama continues to push immigration to the back burner so Arizona took action. My grandpa (WHO ACTUALLY LIVES IN ARIZONA) sent me an email with this letter
from an Arizona Senator in it.



"I’m Arizona State Senator Sylvia Allen. I want to explain SB 1070 which I voted for and was just signed by Governor Jan Brewer. Rancher Rob Krentz was murdered by the drug cartel on his ranch a month ago. I participated in a senate hearing two weeks ago on the border violence, here is just some of the highlights from those who testified.

"The people who live within 60 to 80 miles of the Arizona/Mexico Border have for years been terrorized and have pleaded for help to stop the daily invasion of humans who cross their property. One Rancher testified that 300 to 1200 people a DAY come across his ranch vandalizing his property, stealing his vehicles and property, cutting down his fences, and leaving trash. In the last two years he has found 17 dead bodies and two Koran bibles.

"Another rancher testified that daily drugs are brought across his ranch in a military operation. A point man with a machine gun goes in front, 1/2 mile behind are the guards fully armed, 1/2 mile behind them are the drugs, behind the drugs 1/2 mile are more guards. These people are violent and they will kill anyone who gets in the way. This was not the only rancher we heard that day that talked about the drug trains.

"One man told of two illegal’s who came upon his property. One shot him in the back and the other shot him in the arm after forcing them to carry the drugs. Daily they listen to gun fire during the night. It is not safe to leave his family alone on the ranch and they can’t leave the ranch for fear of nothing being left when they come back.

"The border patrol is not on the border. They have set up 60 miles away with check points that do nothing to stop the invasion. They are not allowed to use force in stopping anyone who is entering. They run around chasing them and if they get their hands on them then they can take them back across the border.

"Federal prisons have over 35% illegal’s and 20% of Arizona prisons are filled with illegal’s. In the last few years 80% of our law enforcement that have been killed or wounded have been by an illegal.

"The majority of the people coming now are people we need to be worried about. The ranchers told us that they have seen a change in the people coming. They are not just those who are looking for work and a better life.

"The Federal Government has refused for years to do anything to help the border states. We have been over run and once they are here we have the burden of funding state services that they use. Education costs have been over a billion dollars. The healthcare costs billions of dollars. Our State is broke with a $3.5 billion deficit and we have many serious decisions to make. One is that we do not have the money to care for any who are not here legally. It has to stop. The border can be secured. We have the technology we have the ability to stop this invasion. We must know who is coming and they must come in an organized manner legally so that we can assimilate them into our population and protect the sovereignty of our country. We are a nation of laws. We have a responsibility to protect our citizens and to protect the integrity of our country and the government which we live under.

"I would give amnesty today to many, but here is the problem: we dare not do this until the Border is secure. It will do no good to forgive them because thousands will come behind them and we will be over run to the point that there will no longer be the United States of America but a North American Union of open borders. I ask you what form of government will we live under? How long will it be before we will be just like Mexico, Canada or any of the other Central American or South American countries? We have already lost our language. Everything must also be printed in Spanish. We have already lost our history. It is no longer taught in our schools. And we have lost our borders.

"The leftist media has distorted what SB 1070 will do. It is not going to set up a Nazi Germany. Are you kidding? The ACLU and the leftist courts will do everything to protect those who are here illegally. SB 1070 was passed in an effort to try and stop illegal’s from setting up businesses, and employment, and receiving state services and give the ability to local law enforcement when there is probable cause (like a traffic stop) to determine if they are here legally. Federal law is very clear if you are here on a visa you must have your papers on you at all times. That is the law. In Arizona, all you need to show you are a legal citizen is a driver license, MVD identification card, Native American Card, or a Military ID. This is what you need to vote, get a hunting license, etc.. So nothing new has been added to this law. No one is going to be stopped walking down the street etc… The Socialist who are in power in DC are angry because we dare try and do something and that something the Socialist wants us to do is just let them come. They want the “Transformation” to continue.

"Maybe it is too late to save America. Maybe we are not worthy of freedom anymore. But as an elected official I must try to do what I can to protect our Constitutional Republic. Living in America is not a right just because you can walk across the border. Being an American is a responsibility and it comes by respecting and upholding the Constitution the law of our land which says what you must do to be a citizen of this country. Freedom is not free.

"Respectfully,

"Sylvia Allen
Arizona State Senator"

7 comments:

Unknown said...

Are you sure that is a real letter? There were a lot of spelling and grammar errors. Especially for a Senator.

Actually Jared, I thought your points were much better than the letter's. The letter had a conclusion inconsistent with the evidence it provided.

Mark James said...

I agree with Jeff, the Senator seemed to be emoting more than making a logical argument.

I thought these two statement were especially interesting:

"How long will it be before we will be just like Mexico, Canada or any of the other Central American or South American countries? We have already lost our language. Everything must also be printed in Spanish. We have already lost our history. It is no longer taught in our schools."

"Maybe it is too late to save America. Maybe we are not worthy of freedom anymore."

This brings up a separate issue: Why is it easier to articulate liberal values than conservative values. Or maybe I should ask--why does there seem to be a shortage of articulate republicans?

Jared said...

I agree with both of you on the grammatical issues. I actually edited the article a bit to make it more understandable without changing the context or meaning that she was trying to get across.

I realize as well that she got off topic a bit. What I found valuable was that she believes in the law enough to publicly defend it. There are so many that have come to conclusions about the law based on media coverage and their own lazy ignorance.

Yes, this is a real letter. I googled it and found the source. I hyperlinked the original source at the end of my preface.

Jared said...

Mark,

I haven't noticed an imbalance with regard to communication ability of each party. Maybe a few examples would help me understand what you mean. Obviously, this senator is a great example of a conservative that has been found lacking; but who else are you referencing?

Mark James said...

I have so much to say on this point; I will try not to get sidetracked but forgive me when I do. If you want some examples I can give you a few: Bush, McCain not so good, Clinton, Obama really good. Palin is ok. Romney is a good but many doubt his sincerity on some issues. However, my main point is that it is easier to argue liberal values than conservative ones. Liberals say they are compassionate and educated and conservatives are mean and ignorant. It is easier to argue for government assistance than to argue for personal responsibility. This difficulty, I believe, contributes to the shortage of articulate republicans. I think we can agree that the Democrats, in general, are better at communicating their values than Republicans. This is obviously a center-right country and the liberals still own the public discussion. Their values permeate academia, the media, the arts, and Hollywood. Liberals have magic words that end the debate: racist, sexist, islamophobe, bigot, homophobe, xenophobe, etc. If you support SB 1070, you are a xenophobe, if you support Prop 8 you are a bigot and a homophobe, if you’re a Tea Party-er you must be racist, and the list goes on. I just get this feeling that republicans are always looking for the next Ronald Reagan and such a person has yet to arise. Anyways, I could go in a hundred different directions and I probably didn’t answer your question so I’ll just leave it at that.

Mark James said...

And by articulate I don't just mean well-spoken. I also
mean someone who can clearly define what conservatives stand for in a non-threatening way. Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck are not non-threatening.

Jared said...

Actually Mark, you answered my question perfectly, and I totally see your poing. In fact, I'm very curious to hear the rest of your thoughts.

I've got a proposition for ya. I hate the politically correct world in which we live and would love it if another Reagan would show up. You talked about the hundred different ways you could go with this.

I'd like to hear a bit more. Would you be willing to write your thoughts out and email them to me? I don't mind if its long, because I think it deserves its own post.

Whaddaya say? If so, send it to:

JaredRay991@gmail.com